If evolution (in the molecules to man sense) were true, then something so remarkably complex as humans, if produced by this "evolutionary process" surely should not be subject to death though senescence (the condition or process of deterioration with age).  After all, what "evolutionary advantage" is there to senescence?  And why would senescence occur?   If evolution could build something so complex, why can it not maintain it?

Under an evolutionary scenario there should be death only by accident, disease, or violence, but old age should not occur; rather, our cells should go on replicating repairs for ever.  This "evolution" that supposedly "created us over millions of year" is so puny that it cannot sustain us beyond a mere 80 or 90 years of age? 

Death through senescence (and death by any means) is clear evidence of the curse of Genesis Chapter 3 and the reality of God.  God created us to live for ever, but enforced a limit to our lifespans (though senescence) as a consequence of sin--and as a deliverance from this sin-cursed world (thank you Jesus!).

Of course we don't need this argument to believe in God, the evidence is all around us for God's reality and there is no logical explanation for the cosmos and all that is in it but that God created it and sustains it.  And of course evolution is not true; there are manifold reasons that it is not true, such as where did morals come from, where did our minds come from (as "evolution" would only operate on the material presumably), etc.

Views: 84

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

You are so right, Paul. Evolution is such a flawed theory and has been disproved even back in the 1800's, yet it keeps going with the propping up of "religious" and well paid scientists who refuse to let it go.

I think the idea that there is truly a Creator who made all scares atheistic scientists, who refuse to confront their unbelief. Their lives and their "fortune" relies on their maintenance of this belief. It is far beyond just a theory like so many other theories. This theory has money and jobs and reputations staked in it. There are laws and statutes standing on it. Entire careers, years of study, and billions of dollars ride on it. Is there any other supposed scientific theory so vested? But beyond that, this theory is actually a heresy against God and the Bible, which is sin against God. It promotes a belief that rejects the Creator and gives "nature" god-like status, "worshiping the creature or creation above the Creator." Evolution is not just a scientific theory, it is a heresy and a sin against Christ and tool of Satan to destroy millions of souls.

Paul,

GOD-guided (co)evolution is correct and is part of Seal #1 of the "7 Seals" revealed as 'Beyond Einstein Theories' .

Brad, to attribute "God-like" ability to the non-sentient idea of evolution is nonsense. The Creator creates and did not "guide" evolution. The idea/theory is without merit and has been debunked since the late 1800's. Its basis in religious belief is all that keeps it afloat, not science. It is a heresy against God and has no irrefutable evidence to the contrary. Those that waste their lives in its study rather than seeking to understand the creation and how it was made with such superior wisdom and design, are truly doing a disservice to themselves and the rest of us and especially harming children with their drivel.


Brad believes HE IS "THEE authority on all biblical interpretation" and he is the re-incarnation of Albert Einstein. If you disagree with Brad you are reprobate.


Douglas Roy said:

Brad, to attribute "God-like" ability to the non-sentient idea of evolution is nonsense. The Creator creates and did not "guide" evolution. The idea/theory is without merit and has been debunked since the late 1800's. Its basis in religious belief is all that keeps it afloat, not science. It is a heresy against God and has no irrefutable evidence to the contrary. Those that waste their lives in its study rather than seeking to understand the creation and how it was made with such superior wisdom and design, are truly doing a disservice to themselves and the rest of us and especially harming children with their drivel.

No man who teaches heresy is an authority on anything to do with God. He does not know God or understand the Bible and has need to repent.

Jim Brenneman said:


Brad believes HE IS "THEE authority on all biblical interpretation" and he is the re-incarnation of Albert Einstein. If you disagree with Brad you are reprobate.


Douglas Roy said:

Brad, to attribute "God-like" ability to the non-sentient idea of evolution is nonsense. The Creator creates and did not "guide" evolution. The idea/theory is without merit and has been debunked since the late 1800's. Its basis in religious belief is all that keeps it afloat, not science. It is a heresy against God and has no irrefutable evidence to the contrary. Those that waste their lives in its study rather than seeking to understand the creation and how it was made with such superior wisdom and design, are truly doing a disservice to themselves and the rest of us and especially harming children with their drivel.

Douglas Roy said:

No man who teaches heresy is an authority on anything to do with God. He does not know God or understand the Bible and has need to repent.

AMEN

AMEN

Reply to Discussion

RSS

About CC

Connecting Christians who believe in Biblical Creation — discussing beliefs, sharing ideas, and recommending evolution-free resources. Please keep all posts relevant to the topics of this community.

Rules of Engagement
Zero Tolerance Policy
Statement of Faith
Creation Terms
FAQ

Homeschool Curriculum

Members

Creation Conversations 2018

What's new @ CC for 2018? 

Creation networking and much more in store for Creation Conversation Members. You'll not want to miss this new year!

© 2019   Created by Creation Conversations.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service