It was brought to my attention that the science I was talking about in discussions was more appropriately termed Naturalism whereas a more appropriate definition of science should be "knowledge." I started another thread titled Methodological Naturalism and Creation Science where I argued that the entire discipline of scientific creationism falls under the disipline of methodological naturalism. What is your opinion about the definition of science? Does science extend beyond the ability of natural explanations?

Tags: epistemology, is, naturalism, of, philosophy, science, what

Views: 6182

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Is that a fact?

Oh no, sorry, there's no such thing.

Look at that. You're actually right about something. It's an interpretation. It seems pretty clear from my angle.

Margaret said:

Is that a fact?

Oh no, sorry, there's no such thing.

Reply to Discussion

RSS

Resources

follow us on Twitter

© 2012   Created by Creation Conversations.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service