With their short 5,700-year half-life, no carbon 14 atoms should exist in any carbon older than 250,000 years. Yet it has proven impossible to find any natural source of carbon below Pleistocene (Ice Age) strata that does not contain significant amounts of carbon 14, even though such strata are supposed to be millions or billions of years old. Conventional carbon 14 laboratories have been aware of this anomaly since the early 1980s, have striven to eliminate it, and are unable to account for it. Lately the world’s best such laboratory which has learned during two decades of low-C14 measurements how not to contaminate specimens externally, under contract to creationists, confirmed such observations for coal samples and even for a dozen diamonds, which cannot be contaminated in situ with recent carbon.27 These constitute very strong evidence that the earth is only thousands, not billions, of years old.

Views: 62

Replies to This Discussion

Here is an interesting article on C14 (AMS) of dino bones, if you look at the article you'll find these dates as very young compared to the inferences of evolutionary teaching.

http://www.dinosaurc14ages.com/carbondating.htm

ALso when this information was tried to be presented at the world paleo meeting, they wee not allowed to provide this information, but there is a video of one of the guys who did bring it up before they were kicked out.  This again shows the protectionism of Darwinian teaching as opposed to plain academic pursuit.  Academia accepts only what they think is relevant to their theory...

We have soft tissue in dino's?

Thanks Lou I have saved this for future information.



Lou Hamby said:

Here is an interesting article on C14 (AMS) of dino bones, if you look at the article you'll find these dates as very young compared to the inferences of evolutionary teaching.

http://www.dinosaurc14ages.com/carbondating.htm

ALso when this information was tried to be presented at the world paleo meeting, they wee not allowed to provide this information, but there is a video of one of the guys who did bring it up before they were kicked out.  This again shows the protectionism of Darwinian teaching as opposed to plain academic pursuit.  Academia accepts only what they think is relevant to their theory...

We have soft tissue in dino's?

RSS

About CC

Connecting Christians who believe in Biblical Creation — discussing beliefs, sharing ideas, and recommending evolution-free resources. Please keep all posts relevant to the topics of this community.

Rules of Engagement
Zero Tolerance Policy
Statement of Faith
Creation Terms
FAQ

Homeschool Curriculum

Members

Creation Conversations 2018

What's new @ CC for 2018? 

Creation networking and much more in store for Creation Conversation Members. You'll not want to miss this new year!

© 2019   Created by Creation Conversations.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service