Daniel Pech
  • Male
  • Gresham, OR
  • United States
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook Share

Daniel Pech's Friends

  • Jim Brenneman
  • Steven Craig

Daniel Pech's Groups

Daniel Pech's Discussions

Farmer to the Stars is too Secular for the anti-theistic Space Program
2 Replies

The final question, to an essentially anti-theistic (ala anti-Genesis-1) Space Program, is whether opposing the average man's wish to 'contaminate' even the Moon with terrestrial biological material…Continue

Tags: secular, genuinely, Moon, Man, Atheist

Started this discussion. Last reply by Jim Brenneman Dec 23, 2017.

My replies to Lou
3 Replies

Lou Hamby said:There are some on this web site that treat Christians with a different view with disdain...Jim has very particular things in mind as to his topics. You should realize that by now. You…Continue

Started this discussion. Last reply by Daniel Pech Sep 26, 2017.

What is the relationship between Chapter One and Chapter Two of the book of Genesis?

I'm not very good at knowing what is off-topic, nor simply realizing that something is off-topic. This is especially a problem when I don't particularly know what the topic is in terms of its general…Continue

Started Sep 8, 2017

The Drake Equation on Everything: How An Essentially Godless Conception of Science Misunderstands Everything

The Drake Equation on EverythingPart 1: MusicThe nature of the relation between human musical perception of sound and human sonic-vocal language has, on the part of some scholars, been so overlooked…Continue

Started Aug 14, 2017

 

Daniel Pech's Page

Latest Activity

Jim Brenneman replied to Daniel Pech's discussion 'Farmer to the Stars is too Secular for the anti-theistic Space Program'
"What? but existed within the Universe before the great creation event,. . . Nothing, no THING exsited before the Creation event. The Creation Event was "In the Beginning" and the Bible states clearly that all things were created in the…"
Dec 23, 2017
Lou Hamby replied to Daniel Pech's discussion 'Farmer to the Stars is too Secular for the anti-theistic Space Program'
"It is abut what God did!  Frankly it doesn't matter what Walton believes? How does one get past the first chapter of John, and that all things exist and consist becasue of the Logos who was there in the beginning?From the creation of the…"
Dec 19, 2017
Daniel Pech replied to Jim Brenneman's discussion 'Why we MUST reach kids. . .'
"There is the Jew ideal, that I have heard of, regarding how to meet at table. After everyone is assembled to eat, and the Patriarch prays, and the quote a portion of scripture, the sharing about their respective day's experiences, and about…"
Dec 1, 2017
Daniel Pech replied to Jesus is Lord's discussion 'Help with my daughters persuasive speech!!'
"Better to begin by showing how some foundational part of the Bible is evidentially true, and how critics of that truth are wrong or ill-founded."
Nov 29, 2017
Daniel Pech replied to Jim Brenneman's discussion 'Why we MUST reach kids. . .'
"Creation ministries can become the most kid-friendly only if they involve significant serious effort to show how deeply to which Genesis 1 comports with the fact that the completed Earth is a life-support system. No normal child ever first or best…"
Nov 29, 2017
Daniel Pech posted a discussion

Farmer to the Stars is too Secular for the anti-theistic Space Program

The final question, to an essentially anti-theistic (ala anti-Genesis-1) Space Program, is whether opposing the average man's wish to 'contaminate' even the Moon with terrestrial biological material is not the right thing to do?In other words, is the idea of Farmer to the Stars too a-metaphysical for atheist's wish to best prove that life evolved?For, if such 'contamination' had been left to its own rightfully secular devices, then the Atheist Religion would be precluded its own most realistic…See More
Nov 29, 2017
Daniel Pech replied to Lou Hamby's discussion 'Human family from Dr. Snelling'
"I have not seen many graphs, nor do I care about most graphs of most things, and usually not much about graphs that I think might be accurate. My own brain likes graphs, but not for their information, nor for their author. I just like patterns. So…"
Sep 26, 2017
Daniel Pech replied to Daniel Pech's discussion 'My replies to Lou'
"Lou, you presented the following nine words: I cannot disagree with what I think those words most naturally mean. Nevertheless, the most charitable thing that I can assume about your general efforts here at CC is that you have certain…"
Sep 26, 2017
Daniel Pech replied to Jim Brenneman's discussion 'Meaning of "Earth" in Genesis 1:1-2'
"I offer a number of analogies to your question, 'What is the meaning of “Earth” in Genesis 1:1?' What is the meaning of 'heavy' in the normal everyday statement that "The weight bar was so overloaded with weights…"
Sep 26, 2017

Profile Information

Are you a church leader? If so, please tell us if you are a pastor, deacon/elder, or work with youth, adults, etc.
no
Do you homeschool or send your children to a private Christian school?
Yes
Do you have your own blog, website, or ministry? If so, please share it with us.
https://theyusedtocallitfamily.wordpress.com/
Are you a student/teacher/professor? High School or College?
no
Do you believe in the literal translation of Genesis?
yes
Describe your interest in joining the community
Psalm 104, mostly.

Once, there lived an Ogre, far, far away.
Where the Orgre lived, orgres weren't real.
So he didn't actually live there.

And he wasn't an ogre.
He was an onion.
Like everyone else.

God did not create humans inside a nearly-windowless, non-rotating space ship far out in interstellar space. He created us on a completed living planet. This is why a God-given normal human concern is for how the stable natural physical world came to be. No matter what century or culture in which we are born, we are ever centrally concerned for the part of our physical cosmos that we immediately see naturally supports life.

So, on the one hand, despite literary-centrists such as John Walton, the ancient Hebrew prophets were not some kind of hermits with respect to physical and terrestrial cosmology; And, on the other hand, despite 'science'-centrists, such as Hugh Ross and John Lennox, Genesis 1 is not directly concerned for, much less in support of, the modern secularist-atheist, long-ages cosmological frame of reference.

Carl Sagan, in his famed TV show, Cosmos, maintained a pretense of objectivity by way of trivial locations in interstellar space, and of being inside a space ship, and of watching the cosmos supposedly evolve over eons. But humans' proper main frame of reference is that from a completed living planet, not of any actual or supposed pre-Earth cosmos.

Genesis 1---every bit of it---is universally accessible to the normal human being because of how it begins and proceeds. It tells of how our planet functions to support life, and it does this by telling us of how God formed and filled our planet. In other words, the true Prime Cosmology begins and proceeds exactly how any normal child could best wish:

By total appearances, the account addresses the most ordinary universal human concern, and addresses it in the universally ordinary, terra-prime way.

Comment Wall

You need to be a member of Creation Conversations to add comments!

Join Creation Conversations

  • No comments yet!
 
 
 

About CC

Connecting Christians who believe in Biblical Creation — discussing beliefs, sharing ideas, and recommending evolution-free resources. Please keep all posts relevant to the topics of this community.

Rules of Engagement
Zero Tolerance Policy
Statement of Faith
Creation Terms
FAQ

Homeschool Curriculum

Members

Creation Conversations 2017

What's new @ CC for 2017? Stay tuned and keep checking back. More ask the experts, more creation networking and much more in store for Creation Conversation Members. You'll not want to miss this new year!

© 2018   Created by Creation Conversations.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service