Matthew's Friends

  • Marvin Schaefer
  • Don B. DeYoung
  • Gene Schlabach
  • Brian Guiley
  • Danny Erhardt
  • Carl D. Kerby
  • David Gnaniah
  • Terry Cave
  • Laura Welch
  • Creation Conversations

Matthew's Groups

Matthew's Discussions

Common Designer v. Common Ancestor
4 Replies

I had an evolutionist tell me //"Common ancestry arguments can be falsified, tested, and practically applied. The recent addition of horizontal gene transfer data that indicates universal common…Continue

Started this discussion. Last reply by Rev Tony Breeden May 16, 2010.

Facebook Group

Hello, there is a group on facebook called Young Earth believers against evolution …Continue

Started May 4, 2010

 

Matthew's Page

Latest Activity

Matthew joined Terry Cave's group
Thumbnail

Evangelism - reaching the world

This group is a place for us to share what we are doing, as we try and reach out to our different communities. A place for support, the sharing of ideas and Prayer. Share how you are involved in "The great commission"".
Jul 1, 2010
Terry Cave and Matthew are now friends
Jun 25, 2010
Matthew posted an event

Home Educators Conference at Greater Virginia Richmond Center

June 11, 2010 at 7:30am to June 12, 2010 at 10:30am
Answers in Genesis event, with Ken Ham and Buddy Davis.
Jun 7, 2010
Matthew replied to Jack Sparrow's discussion 'Do all non-believers deserve to spend eternity in HELL?'
"Actually the number is not going down... it is actually on the rise particularly in Africa and India."
May 16, 2010
Rev Tony Breeden replied to Matthew's discussion 'Common Designer v. Common Ancestor'
"1. He moved the goalpost on you. Three beginning organisms doesn't falsify common ancestry arguments. He's just arguing common ancestry from 3 sources instead of one [which means he doesn't understand HGT [horizontal gene transfer]…"
May 16, 2010
Richard K replied to Matthew's discussion 'Common Designer v. Common Ancestor'
"The problem with microbiological science, is that people are way over their head in making sense of what they think they've learned. "Just the facts, Ma'am." says, Joe Friday. Rather than letting each new discovery, teach us…"
May 16, 2010
Caleb Hines replied to Matthew's discussion 'Common Designer v. Common Ancestor'
"This highlights the difference between observational vs. historical science. In observational science, you can set up an experiment to test a hypothesis, observe the results, and verify whether the hypothesis meets the observed data, or if the data…"
May 15, 2010
Justin replied to Matthew's discussion 'Common Designer v. Common Ancestor'
"My "insight" is that he doesn't believe the Bible. Yeah, I know, not much surprise. But that's the primary reason for his "lack of faith." Which should be obvious. There's really nothing to say to people who think…"
May 15, 2010
Matthew posted a discussion

Common Designer v. Common Ancestor

I had an evolutionist tell me //"Common ancestry arguments can be falsified, tested, and practically applied. The recent addition of horizontal gene transfer data that indicates universal common ancestry is a misnomer and should actually have three beginning organisms, not one, is exactly the type of testing and falsifying that I am talking about. This is not at all the pot calling the kettle black.Common creator arguments cannot be falsified, because, by definition, the supernatural cannot be…See More
May 14, 2010
Matthew posted a discussion

Facebook Group

Hello, there is a group on facebook called Young Earth believers against evolution http://www.facebook.com/home.php#!/group.php?gid=374560436186I would like to encourage you to join this group. There is discussions and there are a few evolutionist in the group. This is a great group for you to witness and provide evidence for Creation and help us in the debate. Thanks :)See More
May 4, 2010
Matthew posted a blog post

Six year old vs. Evolution teacher

One day a 6 year old girl was sitting in the classroom..The teacher was going to explain evolution to the children.The teacher asked a little boy:Teacher: Tommy do you see the tree out side?Tommy: Yes.Teacher: Tommy, do you see the grass out side?Tommy: Yes.Teacher: Go out side and look up and see if you can see the sky.Tommy: OK. (He returned a few minutes later) Yes, I saw the sky.Teacher: Did you see God?Tommy: No.Teacher: That's my point. We can't see God because he isn't there.The little…See More
May 1, 2010
Matthew updated their profile
May 1, 2010
Matthew replied to Stefan Morin's discussion 'Why do You Believe in a Young Earth?'
"I am 16 and I started believing in a young earth around 2 years ago. My parents believed in the gap theory so i never had a problem with an old earth plus I had never thought to add up the genealogies. So one day I started to debate someone on…"
Apr 28, 2010
Matthew commented on Matthew's blog post 'How would I refute this? Please help'
"Thanks for the response guys."
Apr 28, 2010
Allen Roy commented on Matthew's blog post 'How would I refute this? Please help'
"The canonization of the books of the bible came about primarily by common usage. The Church officially canonized the books of the OT and NT at one of their many conferences several hundred years after Jesus, however, this just made official what had…"
Apr 28, 2010
Matthew replied to Justin Poe's discussion 'Noah's Ark found!?'
"I doubt the ark is still around because when Noah go off the ship, he needed to make shelter and fire. With all the wood from the ark, I doubt he would just leave it alone. He probably used the wood from the ark until more trees started growing."
Apr 27, 2010

Profile Information

Are you a student? High school or College?
High School 10th Grade

Matthew's Blog

Six year old vs. Evolution teacher

Posted on May 1, 2010 at 3:29pm 0 Comments

One day a 6 year old girl was sitting in the classroom..



The teacher was going to explain evolution to the children.



The teacher asked a little boy:



Teacher: Tommy do you see the tree out side?



Tommy: Yes.



Teacher: Tommy, do you see the grass out side?



Tommy: Yes.



Teacher: Go out side and look up and see…
Continue

How would I refute this? Please help

Posted on April 25, 2010 at 7:41pm 4 Comments

The main evidence used by Christians to prove the canonicity of the Bible is that there is an extensive number of manuscripts or both the Old and New Testaments, but actually this is not an enough evidence, as the number is not the only factor that tells if it is true or not, what is more important is the time these manuscripts were written, for example in case of the Old Testament, the two major manuscripts are Masoretic text and the Septuagint. The Masoretic text refers back to the ninth… Continue

Comment Wall (3 comments)

You need to be a member of Creation Conversations to add comments!

Join Creation Conversations

At 10:59am on April 20, 2010, Creation Conversations said…
Thanks for joining Creation Conversations. We are so thankful to have you here!
We look forward to hearing your views!

If you are on twitter, please follow Creation Conversations: @creationtalk

Blessings to you.
At 9:44am on April 20, 2010, Danny Erhardt said…
hey this is Danny Erhardt, I'm not completely computer literate but hopefully this is the way to respond to your comment... I have a number of people reading, or who have already read, the book. And the feedback has been very positive. I would be happy to email you as an attachment the entire book--the 12 chapters completed so far (one more to go)--if you send me your email. The only thing I ask is that you email me back after your done with any comments criticisms suggestions etc, as I want to get it in as refined a form as possible b4 i go to publish.
At 4:01pm on April 19, 2010, Janell Robertson said…
Hi Matthew! So glad to have you here at creation conversations. Great conversations happen in groups, in the forum discussions, at in the Ask the Experts page. We look forward to hearing your views.
 
 
 

Resources

follow us on Twitter

© 2012   Created by Creation Conversations.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service