Rachel Hefner's Page

Matthias Wirsich replied to Rachel Hefner's discussion 'When exactly did the scientific shift between creation and evolution happen?'

"Here in Germany this happend approximatelly in 1870 . This was the start of liberal theology in German university cities Heidelberg , Tuebingen, Marburg ect. . Later there was a rise of atheism as new form of religion in the beginning of 1900 when…"

Mar 9

Brian Guiley replied to Rachel Hefner's discussion 'When exactly did the scientific shift between creation and evolution happen?'

"Margaret, Sequential deposition does not dictate millions of years, only a sequential nature. This could happen as fast as it takes for a layer to be deposited - some could be in a matter of minutes. This does not demonstrate millions of…"

Mar 6

Aaron Baker replied to Rachel Hefner's discussion 'When exactly did the scientific shift between creation and evolution happen?'

"Even creationism makes more sense than evolution. I'm not intentionally confusing creationism with Christianity. "

Mar 5

Carolyn Reeves replied to Rachel Hefner's discussion 'When exactly did the scientific shift between creation and evolution happen?'

"I (and others) have already given you several pieces of evidence that challenges the current consensus that the earth is billions of years old. However, I'd be really interested in knowing if you support the accuracy of…"

Mar 5

Bogdan Popescu replied to Rachel Hefner's discussion 'When exactly did the scientific shift between creation and evolution happen?'

"Margaret, According to the opinion of those "virtually every geologist alive today" who dug the Grand Canyon? "

Mar 5

Ralph Bazley replied to Rachel Hefner's discussion 'When exactly did the scientific shift between creation and evolution happen?'

"Margaret, if you wish to put your faith in scientists who are interpreting their data using as their basis that their is no god, and there was no worldwide flood, then that is up to you. You cannot argue that neither you nor I know exactly…"

Mar 4

Margaret replied to Rachel Hefner's discussion 'When exactly did the scientific shift between creation and evolution happen?'

"Carolyn, you're right, the nature of science is that it keeps changing. The current consensus is that the earth is billions of years old. Are you aware of any evidence that challenges that consensus? "

Mar 4

Margaret replied to Rachel Hefner's discussion 'When exactly did the scientific shift between creation and evolution happen?'

"Ralph, your complete lack of scientific understanding is showing. Do you really think that kinetic energy is relevant to plate tectonics? Do you really think that all the geologists working on plate tectonics have failed to spot that…"

Mar 4

Ralph Bazley replied to Rachel Hefner's discussion 'When exactly did the scientific shift between creation and evolution happen?'

"Margaret, I agree entirely with your comment about plate tectonics. When it was suggested by a Christian, he was laughed at, and it was only when data appeared after the war, mapping the ocean floor, that they realized they were wrong. …"

Mar 4

Carolyn Reeves replied to Rachel Hefner's discussion 'When exactly did the scientific shift between creation and evolution happen?'

"Yes, I have read interpretations from both sides. I have no problem with scientists debating different interpretations of the same evidence. This is how science has operated for the past few hundred years, and it is what has given…"

Mar 4

Margaret replied to Rachel Hefner's discussion 'When exactly did the scientific shift between creation and evolution happen?'

"Carolyn, I assume you have read the scientists' responses the Mount St Helens claims? Or do you think they are all keeping quiet and hoping nobody notices?"

Mar 4

Margaret replied to Rachel Hefner's discussion 'When exactly did the scientific shift between creation and evolution happen?'

"Ralph, your theory is based on hearsay, from a period in the infancy of the science. As I understand it, you are claiming that all geologists are operating on faulty data, and that once they are in full possession of the facts, they will realise, as…"

Mar 4

Carolyn Reeves replied to Rachel Hefner's discussion 'When exactly did the scientific shift between creation and evolution happen?'

"Ralph, you made a very valid point. This is certainly not the only example of obvious scientific evidence being ignored by an expert in some scientific field. An assumption was made in the early 1800s that each layer of fossil-bearing…"

Mar 4

Ralph Bazley replied to Rachel Hefner's discussion 'When exactly did the scientific shift between creation and evolution happen?'

"Margaret, why do scientists go along with the crowd when they know that the information is wrong? It seems very hard for most scientists to challenge an authority figure even if they are sure that it is wrong. I quote the example copied…"

Mar 4

Margaret replied to Rachel Hefner's discussion 'When exactly did the scientific shift between creation and evolution happen?'

"Aaron, you're confusing creationism with Christianity. "

Mar 4

Margaret replied to Rachel Hefner's discussion 'When exactly did the scientific shift between creation and evolution happen?'

Mar 4

Rachel Hefner's Friends

Rachel Hefner's Discussions

When exactly did the scientific shift between creation and evolution happen?
231 Replies

Latest Activity

Profile Information

Comment Wall (1 comment)

You need to be a member of Creation Conversations to add comments!

Resources

Rachel Hefner's Friends

Rachel Hefner's Discussions

When exactly did the scientific shift between creation and evolution happen? 231 Replies

Rachel Hefner's Page

Latest Activity

Profile Information

Comment Wall (1 comment)

You need to be a member of Creation Conversations to add comments!

Resources

When exactly did the scientific shift between creation and evolution happen?
231 Replies