The Nodosaur: The Shock: March 21, 2011

(https://youtu.be/F7dcoGCliQA)

It's hard to believe this guy was RECENTLY discovered in tact with bones, skin, keratin coated horns, and guts!

National Geographics cracks me up with their alleged 110 million year old survivor story!

In fact let's look at what the secular world is saying about Mr. Tank!

CNN wrote that: "researchers suggest that the creature “may have been swept away by a flooded river and carried out to sea, where it eventually sank. Over millions of years on the ocean floor, minerals took the place of the dinosaur’s armor and skin, preserving it in the lifelike form now on display.”

Anyone with any kind of experience in the scientific realm (non-the-less marine biology) understand that in simply a matter of days ocean organisms and shrimp can eat a corpse in less that a week. Sometimes even a matter of three days! And they are trying to say that it survived in oceanic conditions for millions of years?! Does anyone see an issue with this?

Another interesting quote that was stated in the national geographic article from what Paleobiologist Jakob Vinther, said, when he was shocked at the find stating that it: "might have been walking around a couple of weeks ago,I’ve never seen anything like this.”

Why are they dating this animal at 110 million years old?

Its the same old argument of (REJECTION) to the global flood, as well as to recognize the circular argument that the fossils date the rock layers and the layers date the fossils and the lies of the Geologic Column.

Once again they are spreading silly nonsense on this amazing find that I believe didn't even last 4,000 years in the soil. Now what that scientist said about a "couple weeks" He wasn't too far off!

In this article they also mention behemoth and I asked myself "Now where would they get that name!?????" 

Isn't it interesting that Christianity has still crept into even the secular articles!? 

May we continue to spread the truth that this nodosaur (An Ankylosaurus without it's defense bone on the end of its tail) is a GORGEOUS PERFECT example of God's great wrath upon the children of disobedience in Genesis 6.

Janessa Cooper

~The Creation Adventurer~

Views: 56

Comment

You need to be a member of Creation Conversations to add comments!

Join Creation Conversations

Comment by Lou Hamby on August 4, 2017 at 9:07am

It's hard to believe this guy was RECENTLY discovered in tact with bones, skin, keratin coated horns, and guts!

National Geographic's cracks me up with their alleged 110 million year old survivor story!  

They  certainly are the impetus for evolutionary inference in a published form, they have been responsible for putting evoutionon the map over the last 50 years!!!

In fact let's look at what the secular world is saying about Mr. Tank!

CNN wrote that: "researchers suggest that the creature “may have been swept away by a flooded river and carried out to sea, where it eventually sank. Over millions of years on the ocean floor, minerals took the place of the dinosaur’s armor and skin, preserving it in the lifelike form now on display.”
Anyone with any kind of experience in the scientific realm (non-the-less marine biology) understand that in simply a matter of days ocean organisms and shrimp can eat a corpse in less that a week. Sometimes even a matter of three days! And they are trying to say that it survived in oceanic conditions for millions of years?! Does anyone see an issue with this?

There are at least 7 known ways an animal can be fossilized.  A huge disastrous rain induced river washing down its contents as we have all seen before in modern times, often completely covers the animal.  We’ve seen this in many different ways.  The fact the animal was under a bunch of substrate and debris is not unusual nor do we know what exactly caused this, it could hav ebeen something like a thermo plastic flow or some other event.  

Another interesting quote that was stated in the national geographic article from what Paleo-biologist Jakob Vinther, said, when he was shocked at the find stating that it: "might have been walking around a couple of weeks ago, I’ve never seen anything like this.”

Agreed it is a remarkable find!

Why are they dating this animal at 110 million years old?

Because the carbon date the substrate its in, or assume an age based on the substrate.  There is really not the only science available to the finders.  IF they USE AMS C-14 and tested the bones, if it has Carbon 14 in it, then it has to be realtively young, not 6,000 years, but within the context of some YE people who believe 25,000 years, its still YE in context to Evolutionary inferences.  After all morris once stood for 10-12,000 year old YE view.  While his coleague ahs written about 25,000 years.  So for me personally 100,000 years of less is still YE compared to mullions of years as implied by secular guesses.

Its the same old argument of (REJECTION) to the global flood, as well as to recognize the circular argument that the fossils date the rock layers and the layers date the fossils and the lies of the Geologic Column.

One does not have to assume a global flood for this incident in history.  In China there are many others that have been found of different species just as well preserved.

Once again they are spreading silly nonsense on this amazing find that I believe didn't even last 4,000 years in the soil. Now what that scientist said about a "couple weeks" He wasn't too far off!

Again no one knows the exact amount of time.  It seems implausible to give this find a 4,000 year old date.  Based on what science, and what implication othet than you assumption, the same thing these scientists have a scenario they f9ollow with dinos, but the evidences don’t pan out.  4,000 years is assumptive on your part.  Without testing the bones for C14 we have no clue.  But since mans written history one assume such beasts would have been included in our writings?  

In this article they also mention behemoth and I asked myself "Now where would they get that name!?????" 

That is interesting....:0)

Isn't it interesting that Christianity has still crept into even the secular articles!? 

May we continue to spread the truth that this nodosaur (An Ankylosaurus without it's defense bone on the end of its tail) is a GORGEOUS PERFECT example of God's great wrath upon the children of disobedience in Genesis 6.

This for me is a natural occurrence that took place in past history due to to some disaster, that fossilized and saved the body in perfect preservation like many other fossils.  Your assumption based on your reading of Genesis
Has many questions that go unanswered.  I don’t think we can assume we have all the answers based on one fossil in the North American continent.  Until we carbon date the bones, we will not have a clue as to its possible real age...

Comment by Janessa Cooper on June 20, 2017 at 10:13pm
Comment by Janessa Cooper on June 20, 2017 at 10:12pm

About CC

Connecting Christians who believe in Biblical Creation — discussing beliefs, sharing ideas, and recommending evolution-free resources. Please keep all posts relevant to the topics of this community.

Rules of Engagement
Zero Tolerance Policy
Statement of Faith
Creation Terms
FAQ

Homeschool Curriculum

Members

Creation Conversations 2017

What's new @ CC for 2017? Stay tuned and keep checking back. More ask the experts, more creation networking and much more in store for Creation Conversation Members. You'll not want to miss this new year!

© 2017   Created by Creation Conversations.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service